Revolution and the Web, feedback wanted, Part 1 of 3
Jan Schenkel
janschenkel at yahoo.com
Tue Nov 28 13:43:58 EST 2006
--- Richard Gaskin <ambassador at fourthworld.com> wrote:
> Mikey wrote:
> > 4) Application server: Big problem. If RR were
> easier to
> > multi-thread this would be much easier, but it
> isn't yet.
>
> Given that Rev can be used with FastCGI, why is this
> a problem?
>
> --
> Richard Gaskin
>
Because with FastCGI you only have a single engine
running, and when that's mulling over 5 million
records in a MySQL database, no other requests can be
handled.
The main advantage of FastCGI is that a single engine
keeps running; thus saving time because the engine
doesn't need to be relaunched, database connection
only needs to be opened once, etc.
But it's still a single-threaded engine... While you
can simulate a lot by using 'send in time' constructs,
this becomes awkward to to script and a flood of
requests will bring it to its knees.
Jan Schenkel.
Quartam Reports for Revolution
<http://www.quartam.com>
=====
"As we grow older, we grow both wiser and more foolish at the same time." (La Rochefoucauld)
____________________________________________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list