How Else to Interact with Browser (was Re:RevolutionWebBrowserPlugin)
luis at anachreon.co.uk
Tue Nov 7 11:37:46 EST 2006
Marielle Lange wrote:
>> The forum frontend (http://forums.runrev.com/) is available for any
>> passerby to see, and it is a very quiet place... Hence the 'sadest
>> Forum I've seen' comment.
> Many have used these forums to make the same comments :-).
Now now, that would rally put newbies off!
>> I'm evaluating several development options, some of which track
>> differently because the nature of some projects doesn't require full
>> blown coding which is easily covered by other apps. Other projects do
>> have that requirement, and I'm looking at least cost (both in software
>> and development time) and then plough through with whatever options I
>> have chosen.
> Then your "fishing" for information/causing reaction behaviour makes
> sense. The different areas you poked are indeed important ones to
> consider when evaluating a technology to use in future projects (to
> depend on for possibly years to come).
It may seem deliberate, but the appearance of 'provocation' is a
by-broduct of the questioning.
> As you are probably well aware of, the tricky question to answer with
> revolution is to guess where the product would be in 3-5 years time.
> Sure it is relatively easy to learn and rapid to program... but it also
> tend to isolate you, getting you loose your flexibility. Reduced costs
> now and possibly huge cost if you need to change your approach later on.
> Similarly, without a good components approach, you could get stuff out
> rapidly... but the cost of getting something out will remain about the
> same over the years. With a components approach, you pay a higher cost
> early on... but the cost progressively decreases.
Dev environments can take a sharp turn just round the corner, new
technologies may render current stuff useless a few months down the
line. That's where the concern comes from, making sure I'm doing the
best I can to make sure I can still produce.
>> There will come a point, if that environment has not evolved into what
>> I reckon it should (call this bug fixes, features, take your pick) I
>> will drop it. This is my personal opinion, no better or worse than
>> anyone else's.
> Six months ago, I expressed my concerns...
> The old direction (heads, top guys) replied to these concerns in a way
> that got me to think that revolution will stay for the next 5 years at
> about at the same place it has been for the last 10 years (including the
> various precursors) and despite having had a huge head start being taken
> over by other technologies.
> The new direction avoided promises and asked me to wait. Not used
> revolution for 6 months.... Learned other technologies, other
> frameworks. I am now in the process of evaluating it again.
That's where I'm at too, although I had not been a list member before.
> Nothing wrong with the questions you try to answer.... The problem is
> that I cannot answer your questions today... I have some elements but
> that I sworn to keep private. There are other answers I simply don't
> have. That's the same for most persons on this list.
> If you have some serious business project in mind and a few features are
> essential to your projects, why not contact revolution's management
> directly and ask them whether there is any chance to have these features
> implemented within 1-5 years?
The words 'blood' and 'stone' come to mind... And following on from your
comments above I doubt it would be productive.
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
More information about the Use-livecode