Pass - is it really needed

[Jerry Daniels]

Actually, I thought of a serious answer to this dilemma.

I was thinking of putting a "-- pass [sys msg name]" in every blank  
system message handler Constellation creates. That way the user could  
un-comment the "pass". Like Chipp, most of the time I find the "pass"  
in a default handler unneeded.

The other approach is to include a pass on those system message  
handlers where it is likely to  be needed--those being the ones that  
the Rev IDE counts on your passing, in particular.

Jerry

Buy Constellation from Runtime Revolution!
http://revstudio.runrev.com/section/revselect/constellation/



On Mar 17, 2006, at 1:37 AM, Chipp Walters wrote:

> Yep, I'd prefer Constellation not place a 'pass' automatically in  
> handlers. I'm sure Jerry will add it as a preference some day :-)
>
> -Chipp
>
> But, you gotta love the tabbed browsing AND the GREAT debugger  
> which doesn't flake out for no apparent reason. Jerry's told me  
> he's worked really hard on making the debugger as robust as  
> possible..and it shows.
>
> Thomas McGrath III wrote:
>> That is correct. I finally see how powerful Constellation is in  
>> my  work flow.
>> On Mar 17, 2006, at 12:22 AM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
>>> Thomas McGrath III wrote:
>>>
>>>> The reason I ask is that when I insert a new command it throws  
>>>> in  a  pass with that commands name by default.
>>>
>>>
>>> This isn't native Revolution behavior. Are you using Constellation?
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your  
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>