step in debugger?

[Jerry Daniels]

Mark,

We did find today that Constellation needs to put a "ghost  
breakpoint" (one the user can't see) after "try". I do that now with  
a bunch of situations where the engine wants to "step out" but the  
user has indicated "step over". We'll just have to crate more ghosts.  
After all, it's nearly Halloween!

Jerry

http://www.daniels-mara.com/products/constellation.htm
Scripts and properties in a tabbed editor!

On Oct 26, 2005, at 5:03 PM, Mark Talluto wrote:

>
> On Oct 26, 2005, at 12:06 PM, Charles Hartman wrote:
>
>
>>
>> On Oct 26, 2005, at 1:56 PM, Mark Talluto wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 26, 2005, at 10:19 AM, Charles Hartman wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> There is a checkbox in Constellation that needs to be checked  
>>>>> called:  into.  Make sure it is checked for it to work as  
>>>>> expected.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ?? I don't want to step into; I want to step over. What I don't  
>>>> want to do is run.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sorry about that.  I guess I did not read very well.  Would  
>>> putting a breakpoint after the line you wish to step over work  
>>> for you?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Yes, that does work. The failure of "step" to behave right isn't  
>> an unsolvable dilemma. It's just that "step" exists for the sake  
>> of saving that labor of setting _two_ (or more) breakpoints every  
>> time you want to watch closely what happens in a short sequence of  
>> lines.
>>
>
> I totally get it Charles.  As in other areas of life, one must use  
> workarounds until something changes.  All in all, it is minor  
> compared the problems that have been solved by Constellation.
>
>
> Mark Talluto
> -- 
> CANELA Software
> http://www.canelasoftware.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your  
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>
>