step in debugger?

[Mark Talluto]

On Oct 26, 2005, at 12:06 PM, Charles Hartman wrote:

>
> On Oct 26, 2005, at 1:56 PM, Mark Talluto wrote:
>
>
>>
>> On Oct 26, 2005, at 10:19 AM, Charles Hartman wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>> There is a checkbox in Constellation that needs to be checked  
>>>> called:  into.  Make sure it is checked for it to work as expected.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ?? I don't want to step into; I want to step over. What I don't  
>>> want to do is run.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> Sorry about that.  I guess I did not read very well.  Would  
>> putting a breakpoint after the line you wish to step over work for  
>> you?
>>
>
> Yes, that does work. The failure of "step" to behave right isn't an  
> unsolvable dilemma. It's just that "step" exists for the sake of  
> saving that labor of setting _two_ (or more) breakpoints every time  
> you want to watch closely what happens in a short sequence of lines.

I totally get it Charles.  As in other areas of life, one must use  
workarounds until something changes.  All in all, it is minor  
compared the problems that have been solved by Constellation.


Mark Talluto
-- 
CANELA Software
http://www.canelasoftware.com