Spelling out the license - some geometry handlers

[David Bovill]

On 23 Nov 2005, at 12:36, Marielle Lange wrote:

> Likewise, I don't believe commercial developers are a threat to the  
> open source movement. So why not change the license to Share alike  
> rather than Share alike-Non commercial?

Thanks for the comments - i agree. I have no real strong opinion on  
which flavour of open license to use. That is a separate debate. i  
think you can build good business models around any of them. I posted  
the license as an example - and to raise what I consider to be  
important legal questions regarding the use of content posted to this  
list. This is something I have always thought should be clarified by  
RunRev - and hopefully done so as part of a well thought out open  
content strategy).

Anyway for my part - there is nothing more I can add to this topic. I  
will do my best to support any clearly licensed open content  
initiative supported by this community.