SHA-1 algorithm in xTalk?
ale870 at gmail.com
Mon Nov 21 10:35:44 CST 2005
Sorry if I introduce myself in this posts.
Please note that md5 is no more reliable! Since it was officially cracked.
Even Sha-0 was cracked, but it is far incomplete/primitive then sha-1,
which is the only reliable hash system to verify digital signature,
software integrity, etc...
On 11/21/05, David Bovill <david at openpartnership.net> wrote:
> No but I need it badly for digital signatures! Don't think anyone
> knows about this though :(
> On 19 Nov 2005, at 03:10, Phil Davis wrote:
> > I don't know much about hashes - is SHA-1 enough better than Rev's
> > md5digest to warrant paying someone to do it? Or will md5digest do
> > what you need?
> > Phil Davis
> > Frank Leahy wrote:
> >> Has anyone ported the SHA-1 algorithm to xTalk? (see http://
> >> www.movable-type.co.uk/scripts/SHA-1.html for details)
> >> If not, would anyone be willing to port it for $$?
> >> Regards,
> >> -- Frank
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
More information about the use-livecode