Table Field Docs?

[Stephen Barncard]

I don't know if would be correct to call it flaky as much as 
undocumented. It might work incredibly well. It might work perfectly 
if we knew how to do it right. So I'll wait for Eric's demo stack.

At 9:12 PM +0100 5/10/05, Peter Reid wrote:
>Hi All
>
>Thanks for all the responses to this.
>
>Looking at Chris' stuff below it seems clear that the table field is 
>very much a "project in progress"!
>
>I think I'll keep well away from it for now as it looks far too 
>flaky for reliable use. Once RunRev have a fully worked out table 
>object, then I'll jump