sorting by date senile?

[xbury.cs at clearstream.com]

Klaus,

Awesome! 

But this doesn't solve a problem with the conversion of dates to dateitems
prior to 1970s! I'll bugzilla that I think!

Shouldn't the centurycutoff be defaulted to 00? I would seem more 
logical...

regards,
Xavier

On 09.03.2005 17:00:56 use-revolution-bounces wrote:
>>Try this one:
>>...
>>set the centurycutoff to "00"
>>sort lines of fld "dateIndex" datetime descending by item 1 of each
>>...
>>
>>Works here for me:
>>
>>01/06/1908     xyz...
>>01/09/1908
>>01/10/1908
>>01/10/1932
>>01/12/1998
>>01/12/1999
>>01/01/2000
>>01/05/2003
>>01/01/2004
>>
>>> Is this a bug?
>>
>>I am afraid this is a feature (of some sort...) ;-)
>
>Danke Klaus! Good going!
>
>Now im much less confused - but still scared of this feature!
>
>cheers
>Xavier
>
>
>-----------------------------------------
>Visit us at http://www.clearstream.com
>IMPORTANT MESSAGE    Internet communications are not secure and therefore
>Clearstream International does not accept legal responsibility for the
>contents of this message.    The information contained in this e-mail is
>confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the
>addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, 
copying,
>distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on 
it,
>is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any views expressed in this e-mail are
>those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically 
states
>them to be the views of Clearstream International or of any of its
>affiliates or subsidiaries.    END OF DISCLAIMER
>_______________________________________________
>use-revolution mailing list
>use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
>http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution