compileIt for revolution?

MisterX b.xavier at internet.lu
Wed Jun 22 10:03:14 CDT 2005


Thanks Alex,

I think i did start out the way you mentioned and then got into the
objectness of the associative array. That may be my problem...

Thanks for the heads up!
Xavier

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Tweedly [mailto:alex at tweedly.net] 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 12:21
> To: x at monsieurx.com; How to use Revolution
> Subject: Re: compileIt for revolution?
> 
> MisterX wrote:
> 
> >[ about the need for more speed for some things ....]
> >Example: The HotKeyN2O stack stores all properties of all 
> controls in a 
> >card when the user opens the card. The props are all in array form 
> >which cannot be stored into another array (time based array 
> of object 
> >changes). So for each object i have to translate array[key]=data to 
> ><key>data</key>.
> >
> >This in turn is stored into a time-based array. So if i need 
> to restore 
> >the property (any) for any object and at any time, it's ultra easy - 
> >except that the translation process is so slow after 10 controls 
> >trasnlated that it's USELESS if i dont write that into a 
> real-compiled 
> >external.
> >  
> >
> I agree with you about the need for more speed for some 
> applications (and sorry Dan, but I've seen requests for more 
> speed a number of times on this list ... sometimes they can 
> be overcome by creative use of Transcript's features in 
> unusual ways, but I'm not convinced that's always possible, 
> nor that it should be necessary to use non-obvious 
> programming tricks, at the cost of loss of readability and 
> maintainability, when some improvements in native performance 
> would do it better)
> 
> But in this example, there may be a better way to organize your (Mr. 
> X's) data that would be fast enough.  2 possibilities I see
> 
> 1. data[key] contains
>   time of change, the new value
>   time of change, the new value
>   etc.
> 
> then you can directly index the individual property, then 
> find the appropriate line entry (which you'd keep sorted). If 
> you needed to, you could then binary search through the lines 
> for the most recent change before the time desired..
> 
> 2. the data is in a time-based array, but as a 'combine'd 
> array-as-list.
> So you'd simply
>   find the array entry based on time    put data[theTime] into myProps
>   split myProps by cr and comma
>   so the value of a property would be myProp[theProp]
> 
> Not sure which of those would be better - depends on the full 
> set of operations you need to do.
> 
> -- 
> Alex Tweedly       http://www.tweedly.net
> 
> 
> 
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.7.8/22 - Release Date: 
> 17/06/2005
> 



More information about the use-livecode mailing list