Remove CRLF

[Mark Smith]

If you're storing these lines as strings of hexadecimal numbers, then 
bear in  mind that Revolution is still seeing them as regular strings, 
so you may need to replace whatever hexadecimal string represents a 
line delimiter explicitly.

Cheers,

mark

On 19 Jun 2005, at 19:31, Michael Young wrote:

> Mark,
>
> Correct. It does not work. I still get the same trailing garbage that 
> is apparently part of the CRLF that I added myself. The garbage is 
> %0d, which I think is 13 when converted from hexadecimal to decimal, 
> meaning that CR is sticking around for some reason.
>
> Michael
>
>>
>> Not sure if I fully understand what you're trying to do, but does
>> 'replace CRLF with empty in <chunk>' really not work?
>>
>> Mark
>>
>> On 19 Jun 2005, at 16:35, Michael Young wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for the suggestions for all who responded, but I have not had
>>> success yet.
>>>
>>> I noticed an interesting subtlety that is of course NOT full 
>>> explained
>>> in the documentation.
>>>
>>> 1. Reference Documentation for Object using Filter with: does not 
>>> show
>>> item hilitedText. It does show selectedText function entry with
>>> apparently second line alternate name hilitedText.
>>>
>>> 2. Reference Documentation for Dictionary using Filter with with: 
>>> does
>>> show both hilitedText and selectedText entries.  The problem is the
>>> hilitedText entry is the exact same as the selectedText entry.
>>>
>>> 3. hilitedText is not in the selectedText function See also: section
>>> presumably because they are considered one and the same.
>>>
>>> 4. line x suggestion also has the CRLF still present. It made no
>>> difference whether list behavior was true or false.
>>>
>>> I still haven't figured out how to get rid of the CRLF that I added.
>>> Very frustrating.
>>>
>>> Michael
>>>
>>> On Jun 19, 2005, at 2:32 AM, use-revolution-request at lists.runrev.com
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Michael
>>>>
>>>> There's different ways to get a line...
>>>>
>>>> get line x of field f will give you the line selected without the
>>>> crlf.
>>>> or
>>>> get the selectedtext of fld f -- if the list is not listbehavior
>>>> or
>>>> get the hilitedtext of fld f -- if the list is listbehavior
>>>>
>>>> Normally, you just need to add cr, not crlf - as far as i know, rev
>>>> takes
>>>> care of the right line delimiter in displays.
>>>>
>>>> cheers
>>>> Xavier
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have added CRLF to end of lines in a Scrolling Field for
>>>>> cosmetic effect. Now I want to strip off the CRLF for a user
>>>>> selected line (although the last line in the Scrolling Field
>>>>> will not have CRLF).
>>>>> What is the simplest way to strip off the CRLF, if present? I
>>>>> have not been able to stumble on the answer or find it in
>>>>> documentation or list archives. Oh well. I am sure the
>>>>> solution is simple.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Michael
>>>>> OS X 10.3.9
>>>>> RR 2.6
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your 
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>