is there a better way to do this?

[Claudi Cornaz]

Hi Björnke,


I can't get your sugestion to work. That's why I do it with a do 
command.
I tried the following script. (uTestSet[uValue] is "Yes")

on mouseUp
   put "uTestSet" into tVar
   put the tVar[uValue] of this stack into fld "debug"
   put cr & "-----" & cr after fld "debug"
   put "put the" && tVar & "[uValue] of this stack after fld" && quote & 
"debug" & quote into tCommandStr
   do tCommandStr
end mouseUp

The result is:

-----
Yes

As you can see the first line is empty and when done with the do 
construct it works. (the line after ------)

What am I doing wrong?

Best wishes
Claudi



On Tuesday, June 14, 2005, at 12:52 AM, Björnke von Gierke wrote:

>
> On Jun 14 2005, at 00:03, Claudi Cornaz wrote:
>
>> .. (with "uText" possibly also in a var?) ..
>
> oh, didn't see this part of your mail, you wanted something like this, 
> right?
>
> on mouseUp
>   put "new" into tSetname
>   put "uText" into tProp
>   put  tSetname & "[" & tProp & "]" into cprop
>   put the cprop of this stack
> end mouseUp
>
> -- 
>
> http://contest.wecode.org
> Now running: the first ChatRev coding contest!
> sponsors:
> Altuit
> Andre Garzia
> Karl Becker
> Runtime Revolution
> TidBITS in cooperation with eHUG
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>