Is it ok to go to 2.6

[Roger Guay]

I've been using it since it was released without any (noticeably  
different) problems.  I'm not the most sophisticated user however,  
and my critics tell me that I tend to "ignore" bugs!!

Roger


On Jul 11, 2005, at 10:33 AM, use-revolution-request at lists.runrev.com  
wrote:

> Message: 10
> Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 04:29:09 -1000
> From: "Jim Bufalini" <yoursignup at yahoo.com>
> Subject: RE: Is it ok to go to 2.6
> To: "How to use Revolution" <use-revolution at lists.runrev.com>
> Message-ID: <NFBBLOHILHFAJLKKJKKLGEMMHIAA.yoursignup at yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain;    charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> I second this question. I'm still running 2.51 on WinXP. Reason:  
> Given the
> choice between new features and less bugs, I always opt for less  
> bugs. -Jim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: use-revolution-bounces at lists.runrev.com
> [mailto:use-revolution-bounces at lists.runrev.com]On Behalf Of
> rev at armbase.com
> Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 12:03 AM
> To: How to use Revolution
> Subject: Is it ok to go to 2.6
>
>
> Hi All.
>
> I noted that the early 2.6 tiger caused some problems I think the  
> "ask"
> command
> was one. I have 2.5 on a winXP. Is it OK to go to 2.6 on WinXP or  
> are there
> still some issues to be resolved that were ok in 2.5?
>
> All the best
> Bob
>