Unicode control pictures on OS X?
BNZ2 at CDC.GOV
Tue Jan 4 13:46:47 EST 2005
And don't forget that fields with part Unicode and part non-unicode act
weird. Best to set the whole field to Unicode.
From: use-revolution-bounces at lists.runrev.com
[mailto:use-revolution-bounces at lists.runrev.com] On Behalf Of J. Landman
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 1:26 PM
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: Re: Unicode control pictures on OS X?
On 1/4/05 10:20 AM, Michael D Mays wrote:
> If I have a glyph that displays on the screen but doesn't print and I
> cover it with a transparent field it will then print. When it prints
> resolution is much less than that displayed. ???
I hit this problem once. When a field is covered by a transparent
object, the engine uses the screen bitmap underneath the transparency
for printing rather than rendering the field text as a font. This is due
to some weird behavior with graphics drivers or something; I can't
remember exactly what. But that's why you can print what you see on
screen, and why it is printing at screen resolution (i.e., bitmapped.)
> And I have a field on a card where the cursor has disappeared (I can
> click and type in the field, but I cannot see the cursor) and in that
> field the Unicode prints OK.
If another object overlaps a field, the cursor can disappear. Check to
make sure there isn't anything over that field. Also make sure the
traversalOn is set to true for the field.
> I guess I just need to figure out how I mucked up that field?:)
Combination of things, sounds like. ;)
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jacque at hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
More information about the Use-livecode