Don't understand the meaning of "local"
alex at tweedly.net
Fri Dec 23 19:21:32 EST 2005
Jim Ault wrote:
>On 12/23/05 12:55 PM, "Jim Hurley" <jhurley at infostations.com> wrote:
>>The persistence of local SCRIPT variables that Chipp's earlier reply
>>clears up for me is handlers calling themselves (in x millisec or
>>whatever) in order to achieve asynchronous behavior ( i.e. not
>>monopolizing CPU time and allowing other uses of the CPU to seek
>Yes, and since there are two types of LOCAL variables, one could adopt the
>g = global, persistent and available to any handler in any script container.
>s = script local, persistent but only available for handlers in that script
>t = temporary or handler local
>p= passed parameter, same as 't'. Important: this is a new variable
>containing a copy of the original contents. Any changes you make to a 'p'
>variable will not change the original. To do that, you need to 'return
>pWhatever' and put it into the original variable.
Or you can pass the parameter by reference; in that case, there is not a
separate, new variable - and any changes made within the handler are
made to the actual variable. You do this by prepending an "@" to the
parameter name, as in
> on myhandler @pByReference
> add 1 to pByReference
> end myhandler
and the effect is to increment the variable passed to the handler.
I have always thought that this would warrant a separate naming
convention (e.g. 'r' for parameter by reference, instead of 'p' for
parameter) - though in fact I haven't used it often enough to feel that
was important for me.
Alex Tweedly http://www.tweedly.net
-------------- next part --------------
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.5/212 - Release Date: 23/12/2005
More information about the Use-livecode