RevSession opening issue (was RE: RunRev versus WinRar)

xbury.cs at clearstream.com xbury.cs at clearstream.com
Mon Apr 11 04:57:18 EDT 2005


It's true that under multi-user-multi-session NT servers, the single 
instance can be useless. 
But in this case, RunRev document launching (from explorer or shell) is 
useless for a single session
and even dangerous for multiple sessions with unsychronized file writes...

Hope there is a solution for all cases ;)

cheers
Xavier


On 11.04.2005 10:39:48 use-revolution-bounces wrote:
>Ken Ray wrote:
>
>> Of course, this *still* isn't Microsoft's official stance on things.
>>
>>Article from Microsoft
>>=============
>>However here's an article *from* Microsoft on "How to Write an 
Application
>>That Supports Fast User Switching in Windows XP":
>>
>>  http://support.microsoft.com/kb/310153/EN-US/
>>
>>Where you get the curious (funny!) statement:
>>
>>  "Note that wherever possible you must ensure that Windows XP 
applications
>>support multiple instances running simultaneously in the same or 
different
>>user sessions. Applications that do not allow multiple instances are not
>>considered best-practice Windows XP applications."
>>
>>ROFLOL!
>>
>>Go figure!
>>
>[ what am I doing defending Msoft ??? ]
>
>I think that paragraph is an accurate description of MS's current
>beliefs and practices. The significant word being the "XP" in  "Windows
>XP applications". Over time, MS has recommended a variety of style -
>single vs multiple vs multiple synch'ed vs .... anything you can
>imagine.  But sometime in the mid-90s, they realized that multiple
>instances produces the fewest problems, and settled on  that as their
>preferred style.
>
>Most, if not all, RECENT Microsoft apps follow that "best practice", and
>I suspect any that don't just haven't had a big enough revision done in
>years.
>
>-
>Alex Tweedly       http://www.tweedly.net


-----------------------------------------
Visit us at http://www.clearstream.com
IMPORTANT MESSAGE    Internet communications are not secure and therefore
Clearstream International does not accept legal responsibility for the
contents of this message.    The information contained in this e-mail is
confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the
addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any views expressed in this e-mail are
those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states
them to be the views of Clearstream International or of any of its
affiliates or subsidiaries.    END OF DISCLAIMER


More information about the use-livecode mailing list