shell() bug in standalone
nnoydb at excite.com
Thu Oct 21 09:14:50 CDT 2004
Due to several bugs including the disappearing object bug I am still using 2.2. I have found 2.5 to be just a bit unstable.
Any resemblance between the above views and those of my
employer, my terminal, or the view out my window are purely
Any resemblance between the above and my own views is non-deterministic.
The question of the existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold
is left as an exercise for the reader. The question of the existence of
is left as an exercise for the second god coefficient.
(A discussion of non-orthogonal, non-integral polytheism is beyond the
scope of this article.)
--- On Thu 10/21, Derek Bump < webmaster at dreamscapesoftware.com > wrote:
From: Derek Bump [mailto: webmaster at dreamscapesoftware.com]
To: use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 23:23:21 -0600
Subject: Re: shell() bug in standalone
> And what version of Rev? If it's in 2.5, did you try 2.2?<br><br>Version 2.5. No, I didn't try 2.2. I'll try it tommorow, and if it works I'll be saying to myself "Figures, I finally use the upgrade, and the older buggier version is actually the better way to go!"<br> <br><br>Derek Bump<br>Dreamscape Software<br>____________________________________________<br>Compress Images Easily with JPEGCompress<br>http://www.dreamscapesoftware.com<br>_______________________________________________<br>use-revolution mailing list<br>use-revolution at lists.runrev.com<br>http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution<br>
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!
More information about the use-livecode