wait with messages revisited.

[K]

Did that to ensure the code would not be misunderstood.  I have found that using that using "if gblA then XXXX" confused many newbie developers.  I find quite easy to understand but I was attempting to code to the lowest denominator.


-==-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-
Disclaimer:

Any resemblance between the above views and those of my
employer, my terminal, or the view out my window are purely
coincidental. 
Any resemblance between the above and my own views is non-deterministic.

 The question of the existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold
them
is left as an exercise for the reader. The question of the existence of
the reader
 is left as an exercise for the second god coefficient. 
(A discussion of non-orthogonal, non-integral polytheism is beyond the
scope of this article.)



 --- On Mon 11/01, Dar Scott < dsc at swcp.com > wrote:
From: Dar Scott [mailto: dsc at swcp.com]
To: use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 14:59:58 -0700
Subject: Re: wait with messages revisited.

<br>On Nov 1, 2004, at 9:24 AM, K wrote:<br><br>>    if gblA is true then return true<br><br>Are you actually doing this?<br>Or this?<br><br>     if gblA then exit repeat<br><br>Dar<br>****************************************<br>     Dar Scott Consulting<br>     http://www.swcp.com/dsc/<br>     Programming Services<br>****************************************<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>use-revolution mailing list<br>use-revolution at lists.runrev.com<br>http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution<br>

_______________________________________________
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!