"Engine" versus "Player"

[Jim Hurley]

>
>Message: 12
>Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 14:43:12 -1000
>From: Sannyasin Sivakatirswami <katir at hindu.org>
>Subject: "Engine" versus "Player"
>To: use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
>Cc: Kevin Miller <kevin at runrev.com>
>Message-ID: <39848374-81E3-11D8-8DEB-000A959D0AC6 at hindu.org>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed


Sannyasin Sivakatirswami wrote:

Snip
>
>Given that there will be a large percentage of IT "nerds" exposed to
>the new technology in the process... (our audience will includes LOTS
>of Indian software people and their children --most of whom have been
>"eaten alive" by MS in terms of their tool set)  it seems worthy of
>some attention, and perhaps a general consensus so we might all do the
>same thing? I see Scott Rossi tending toward "Player..."


Sannyasin,

This is very interesting to me. I have been anxious waiting for the 
"Player" for some time.

But it appears that you have effectively made your own. How exactly 
does this work?

Jim