"Engine" versus "Player"

[Sannyasin Sivakatirswami]

I'm wondering if the  visionaries of the rev community who have a 
broader experience  than most of us about Rev's marketing/brand name 
positioning have any opinions about the nomenclature for splash screen 
standalones players that are designed to drive any number of different 
stacks.

My current implementation allows a stack to be dropped on a splash 
screen and added to a favorites list and saved in a prefs file on the 
hard drive for that particular platform. i.e. it's not tied to any 
particular app.

We plan to distribution these here and there, and  we will find such 
phrases as

"Himalayan Academy Revolution Player"
or
"Himalayan Academy Stack Engine"

ending up on web pages, interfaces, in emails, on CD's, in Read Me's 
and "Help" and "About"  and perhaps one day even in print media and in 
class rooms...

Given that there will be a large percentage of IT "nerds" exposed to 
the new technology in the process... (our audience will includes LOTS 
of Indian software people and their children --most of whom have been 
"eaten alive" by MS in terms of their tool set)  it seems worthy of 
some attention, and perhaps a general consensus so we might all do the 
same thing? I see Scott Rossi tending toward "Player..."

What does everyone think is best?

Sannyasin Sivakatirswami
Himalayan Academy Publications
at Kauai's Hindu Monastery
katir at hindu.org

www.HimalayanAcademy.com,
www.HinduismToday.com
www.Gurudeva.org
www.Hindu.org