Safety of stack encryption.
Alejandro Tejada
capellan2000 at yahoo.com
Sun Mar 21 09:44:30 EST 2004
on Sat, 20 Mar 2004 10:04:59 -0700
Dar Scott wrote in response to Richard Gaskin:
>> It's said to be a derivative of DES, with
equivalent security.
>Though it may have equivalent security, that does not
>follow from the use of DES. Often the weaknesses of
>any protocol are not in the encryption itself but in
>how the encryption is used.
Dar, i remember that Scott Raney states in the
MetaCard documentation that stacks level of encription
is not hacker-proof and recommended to use customs
solutions if more protection is needed.
Mark Brownell has already made a Blowfish encription
stack and Phil Chumbley posted some time ago a script
for one time pad encription, but i don't know how
to protect a whole stack with these solutions.
You have a lot of experience in this area.
Could you made a .dll that provides industrial
strength encription for stacks?
al
=====
Visit my site:
http://www.geocities.com/capellan2000/
Search the mail list:
http://mindlube.com/cgi-bin/search-use-rev.cgi
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list