Windows standalone builder - set version number?
rodney tamblyn
rodney at infiny.co.nz
Mon Mar 8 07:37:34 EST 2004
Monte,
Thanks very much. Can I put my vote in at least to try and get this in
if possible. I think that most developers expect to be able to
dependably set the version number of their applications when building
standalones. The worst thing here is that it appears that setting
versions is support because there are fields for setting the
information in the standalone builder - but it doesn't actually do it.
I was wondering why my installation software was not updating the
executable files - it wasn't until I checked the standalones that I
realised this problem exists. This is not good - but at least there is
a work around.
Rodney
On 8/03/2004, at 8:13 PM, Monte Goulding wrote:
>
>> Hi Monte,
>>
>> Thanks for this information. It's not just XP, the same problem
>> happens under Windows 2000
>
> OK... it will be one fix for all anyway. But it may not get into the
> next
> revision of Rev due to the complexity.
>
> Cheers
>
> Monte
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>
>
>
--
Rodney Tamblyn
44 Melville Street
Dunedin
New Zealand
+64 3 4778606
http://rodney.weblogs.com/
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list