Confused reguarding standalones
nnoydb at excite.com
Thu Jun 3 10:38:59 CDT 2004
I just relaized the stacks have been sropped in the application directory but not by relative path. So 'RR' I guessed modified ny stackFile properties to point the the application directory?
Any resemblance between the above views and those of my
employer, my terminal, or the view out my window are purely
Any resemblance between the above and my own views is non-deterministic.
The question of the existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold
is left as an exercise for the reader. The question of the existence of
is left as an exercise for the second god coefficient.
(A discussion of non-orthogonal, non-integral polytheism is beyond the
scope of this article.)
--- On Thu 06/03, K < nnoydb at excite.com > wrote:
From: K [mailto: nnoydb at excite.com]
To: use-revolution at runrev.com
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 11:11:00 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Confused reguarding standalones
<br><br><br><br>I have built several standalons using RR 2.2. I was under the impression that all the "stack files" in the stackFiles (currently referenced by relative paths) would be copied to the target directory (in their relative location). Also the standalone build seems to thing that a relative path to a stack and a fully qualified path are different even though they are the exact same file (I have reported this as bug in buzilla BTW). Do I need to copy these files to the correct relative location? What are my responisibities when building a stand alone and what are the IDEs?<br><br>K<br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com<br>The most personalized portal on the Web!<br>_______________________________________________<br>use-revolution mailing list<br>use-revolution at lists.runrev.com<br>http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution<br>
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!
More information about the use-livecode