load command security holes?
gizmotron at earthlink.net
Tue Jul 27 15:32:20 CDT 2004
On Tuesday, July 27, 2004, at 01:10 PM, Brian Yennie wrote:
> Using load URL shouldn't ever be able to execute any code or open a
> stack. I would be different if you were using a "go stack" or "open
> stack" with a URL, but load URL should only download, and won't treat
> such as a stack unless you explicitly address it that way in your own
Great, glad to hear it. I've just discovered a mob of interested
customers charging at me to get my MTML browser. One of my sales
persons has an entire company that wants to use it. Two people want the
government to use it. It would take a day to make it a vertical browser
with a company wide customized file format that would not surf outside
the company network. So, sports fans, there's good business in the
FUD/browser security market.
Build a browser, include a unique file format, add encryption, and
market it for vertical markets. Thanks Rev!
More information about the use-livecode