# actually the short way returns an error / PARENTHESES

[Christopher Mitchell]

It is true that the polygon needs to be regular, which really leaves a 
lot to be desired... you can't rotate non-regular vector art, and you 
can't rotate groups of art regular or not.  so the things you're 
rotating are pretty limited.

and my results from rotating things I created with the weird paint tool 
experience shall not even be discussed.

btw I don't know that we call these <> delimiters anything in English.  
They are simply less-than/greater-than signs.  I know, however, they 
they are typographer's quotation marks as << >> around the world.

Yours,
Chris
On Feb 22, 2004, at 2:36 AM, Malte Brill wrote:

> hi opie and all,
>
>> GEEZ!!  I did it again!!!
>
> <g> I always say brackets ( is that []? ) when I mean parentheses [ is 
> that
> ()?]. What is the english name of these <>? If you happen to see me 
> saying
> something about brackets it is always possible I mean parentheses and 
> vice
> versa... :-(
>
>> In the example I sent, there is a precedence problem.
>
> I was pretty confused about that problem and if I remember correctly 
> 1.1.1
> compiled and ran the non parenthesis version.. I might be wrong there.
>
>> P.S. Don't know what kind of graphic that pointer1 is...but...in my
>> test, although it compiled correctly with the above...*my* pointer1
>> didn't seem to rotate...
>
> Needs to be a regular polygon. (I had to look it up, because it didn´t
> rotate here either.)
>
> Best,
>
> Malte
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>