Progress on preventing multiple instances of a program fromrunning in windows
Gordon Tillman
got at mindspring.com
Fri Dec 3 11:38:33 EST 2004
Makes sense Jonathan!
I would be interested in knowing how that works out..
--gordon
On Dec 3, 2004, at 09:31, Lynch, Jonathan wrote:
> I thought about something like that - but was concerned that the app
> would not know if the value had been changed in the file, and then
> terminated. That would not matter if the program is running as a
> visible
> window, because the user could just see that the window is not open,
> and
> tell the program to go ahead and run anyway.
>
> However, I need to use this for a program that will run invisibly. If
> it
> is running invisibly, then most users will not know how to check for
> running processes to determine if the program really is running.
>
> Using sockets allows for the program to see if it is running. My plan
> is
> to make it so that if it is already running, the second instance will
> check to see that the first instance is responsive, then when it
> confirms that it is working, it will tell the first instance to make
> itself visible. Then the second instance will turn itself off.
>
> This way, the program can run invisibly, but whenever the user clicks
> ontthe icon (which will be automatically inserted into the start menu)
> the
> program will just appear on the screen. The user can then change
> preferences and close it, and it goes back to running invisibly. (With
> a
> separate button for shutting down the program, so the user does have
> the
> option to turn it off, if desired)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: use-revolution-bounces at lists.runrev.com
> [mailto:use-revolution-bounces at lists.runrev.com] On Behalf Of Gordon
> Tillman
> Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 10:13 AM
> To: How to use Revolution
> Subject: Re: Progress on preventing multiple instances of a program
> fromrunning in windows
>
> Howdy Folks,
>
> I'm jumping in on this thread a bit late, but I wanted to let you know
> what we are doing to handle this issue.
>
> I have a preferences library that any application can use to manage,
> well, preferences. It does the right thing and stores the preferences
> at the proper location for mac, windows, and linux.
>
> During the application startup code, before I start opening sockets but
> after having initialized the preferences, I check for the presence of a
> preference called "running" that has a value of "yes" or "no".
>
> If the preference has a value of "yes", then the application displays a
> message to the effect of "It appears that another instance of this
> program may be running. That can also be caused if it had terminated
> abnormally before. Do you wish to continue starting up?" The user can
> click Yes or No.
>
> Normal operation is as follows:
>
> Application starts up. Checks the pref. Sets it to "yes" and saves
> preferences (to flush the updated value out to the file). The on
> shutdown handler sets the value back to "no".
>
> --gordon
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list