What is the word for "call" but not using the 'call' command

[Jeanne A. E. DeVoto]

At 1:27 PM -0600 8/17/2004, Dar Scott wrote:
>Consider this handler:
>
>on doSomething
>    doThis
>    doThat
>end doSomething
>
>I would normally say that doSomething calls doThat.  But there is a 
>command called 'call'.  Is there a prefered xTalk word?  Executes? 
>Invokes?  Uses?  (Hmmm, sounds like 'start using'...)  Directly 
>calls?

"Call" seems fine to me in this context. (After all, it's why the 
call command is called that, and not the "invoke" command, or...)

You could also say that doSomething sends a doThis message.
-- 
jeanne a. e. devoto ~ revolution at jaedworks.com
http://www.jaedworks.com