XUL, not OT anymore... was (Re: little OT (was Re: woah!))

[Ken Ray]

On 8/12/04 5:26 PM, "Andre Garzia" <soapdog at mac.com> wrote:

> 
> On Aug 12, 2004, at 6:47 PM, Ken Ray wrote:
> 
>> 
>>> I've spent a good bit of time with XUL. It's pretty cool for what it
>>> tries to do but it's very limiting and a poor dev choice because of a
>>> lack tools for creating the UI.
>> 
>> Hey, Andre - why don't you use Rev as a front end for creating XUL?
>> Then you
>> could make it public and it would also garner some interest in Rev as a
>> development tool.
>> 
>> Whaddya think?
> 
> Ken,
> 
> I was thinking about a Card to Xul conversor like the one I use to make
> forms with RevHTTPd. We could loop the controls and spit a XUL file, of
> course the main problem would be the scripts inside the controls, but
> if one is using revHTTPd then any script can be accessed by a URL, so I
> think some time soon we may have a nice and transparent way to put our
> cards into mozilla...
> 
> what about this?

Sounds good to me!

Let me know when you're done... ;-)

Seriously - is anyone else interested in taking a look at this? If not,
perhaps you and I should take this off list...


Ken Ray
Sons of Thunder Software
Web site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/
Email: kray at sonsothunder.com