Educational uses for Rev
rodney tamblyn
rodney at infiny.co.nz
Thu Aug 12 18:43:57 EDT 2004
Hi Gregory,
Thanks for your interesting posting, and to everyone else who has
contributed to this thread
I've been involved in developing educational media software for over 10
years, at a University here in NZ until a few years ago when I went out
on my own. A lot of my early work was in the area of computer assisted
learning, using HyperCard. Later I branched out into other academic
disciplines, particularly medical teaching. I'm also convinced of the
potential of applications like Revolution to contribute to meaningful,
constructivist, student-centred online learning spaces.
Over the last two years I've been trying to put these ideas into
practice in a commercial form. I've just released the results of this
work, an application called OceanBrowser (PC/OSX) to my first
customers. Developed in Revolution it combines a set of learning
objects, a backend database on the internet for collaborative data, and
a content management system for course data distributed on CD-ROM.
It's designed to allow people to start out with what they have and feel
comfortable with, and to gradually increase the interactivity/scope of
learning activities as time and resources allow. It's important to the
business model that the software is practical out of the box.
For those of you who are interested in the detail of the current
product, here's a little more information. My initial customers are
all involved in online postgraduate medical education. They have a
well defined set of requirements, which include the ability to work
with complex multimedia such as VR movies, audio, and large numbers of
high resolution images. They also have a lot of documents that need
distribution, typically Acrobat documents and Powerpoints. We
converted the latter to Flash in order to more seamlessly display them
in OceanBrowser. The product uses Altuit's excellent Altbrowser dll
(on the Windows platform) to show web content. OceanBrowser supports a
custom protocol ("ocb://") which allows academics to embed links in web
pages or emails to point to specific learning resources in
OceanBrowser. When the student clicks on this link, OceanBrowser will
open, retrieve the resource (typically from a database stored on the
local computer) and display. Next to every resource displayed in the
system is a comments area that "tracks" the content being showed.
Users can post comments to this area, which may also embed appropriate
metadata (e.g. posting to an audio item includes link to the timepoint
the user was at in the audio file, posting to Flash powerpoint links to
slide). "Resource" can be anything ranging form a document (pdf,
webpage), multimedia (image, movie) to an application (Flash player,
Director projector, etc). The foregoing list may seem to be overly
orientated around document distribution, as I said though, my users
have a large body of existing content they need to work with, so stage
one is to address these problems.
One of the more interesting learning objects in the system at the
moment is an image annotation tool, which allows the user to view or
create multimedia annotations to an image (by drawing a region on the
image, recording an audio commentary, and providing additional
information such as name, description etc). This has been based on
some research I've been doing over the last year or so, and I hope to
extend these annotation features to support true, distributed,
collaborative image annotation.
With OceanBrowser I'm hoping that by creating a sustainable business
model I'll be able to afford to invest the time into interaction
design, prototyping, and research (review of educational
literature/other products) that will be required to implement some of
the more exciting educational ideas that I want to see in the product
over time.
The new website for Oceanbrowser.com will be going up in a couple of
weeks, now that the software product is complete. I hope then that we
can put some demo content up for everyone to have a look at.
Regards,
Rodney
On 13/08/2004, at 9:14 AM, Gregory Lypny wrote:
> You're most welcome, Judy.
>
> In fact, I've opposed the development of online courses at Concordia,
> not only because the professor as communicator of his or her own
> research and art is removed from the equation (that online forums do
> not fill the gap is another story we could get into) and student
> interaction becomes marginal (it need not, but it does), but because
> web stuff is almost always more form than content and is generally not
> even developed by the educator. I haven't seen many online courses
> that are not fluff.
>
> The potential benefits of standalone courseware, created with
> HyperCard-like languages, as complements to traditional lectures is,
> in my opinion, mind boggling. It would be trivial, for example, to
> create a Revolution stack that selects random excerpts of prose by
> authors who are considered to write in the same genre and present
> these to the student for comparison. But better still, have the
> professor use the stack in the class as a presentation vehicle so that
> he or she is also in the dark as to the prose that will be pulled up
> for comparison, and therefore would not benefit from the perfect
> foresight of dusty old critiques that otherwise could be used as a
> weapon of mass smugness (nasty, eh?). Make the profs earn their keep.
>
> I have long stopped evangelizing courseware because the response I get
> from colleagues is that they do not want to be involved with its
> development. The incentive to do the work is simply not there. I
> make my stuff freely available to my colleagues, but their enthusiasm
> quickly peters when I explained that some work is required to get it
> to do what they want it to do. They'll only give it a spin if it's
> ready to go right off the shelf. But what is right off the shelf
> often wasn't developed with the direct and ongoing involvement of the
> educator and is unlikely to have the educational depth that it
> otherwise could. (In deference to everyone on this list, I'm not
> saying that you have to be an educator to create something
> educational. Quite the contrary: some of the fluffiest stuff I've
> seen was created by educators who don't have a particular speciality
> in any discipline. What I am saying is that courseware will be
> meatier if it is created by a scholar, which is someone who has a
> speciality and has produced original work in the sciences, humanities
> or art.) Of course, the dilemma faced by companies such as Runtime
> Revolution is that they can never make their software easy enough to
> use to appeal to a big enough market of individual educators because
> of the incentive problem. Some hope does lie with the many
> consultants and free-lance developers who have a scholarly bent, or
> have formed close collaborations with those who do. But I think that
> many of them would agree that the education market is not particularly
> lucrative, and we're back to where we started. I should leave this
> with a positive spin: courseware = cool, untapped potential. We just
> need more impressive examples of it in use.
>
> Gregory
>
>
>
> On Aug 12, 2004, at 2:57 PM, Judy Perry wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Gregory, for this insight.
>>
>> I find it particularly interesting given that I just finished a
>> master's
>> in instructional design & technology... in which the mantra seemed to
>> be
>> "web uber alles". And, like you, I tended to disagree.
>>
>> I think the problem with the web uber alles folks is that they do not
>> possess the ability (much less the interest, I guess) of producing
>> standalone interactive courseware. So what we get is alot of form
>> trumping function.
>>
>> A pity...
>>
>> Judy
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>
>
>
--
Rodney Tamblyn
44 Melville Street
Dunedin
New Zealand
+64 3 4778606
http://rodney.buzzword.com/
http://oceanbrowser.com
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list