ActiveX and RR

[Mark Wieder]

Troy-

Tuesday, August 10, 2004, 8:19:26 AM, you wrote:

TR> I'm only interested in seeing Rev have the capacity to do even more
TR> than it can currently do. I really don't care what means that is 
TR> through, only that it shouldn't involve a C compiler. It should tap
TR> into some library of tools which is being continuously added to, and is
TR> designed for the average developer to tie into their projects.

Yes - this is exactly the point of a generic extensibility mechanism.

One analogy that comes to mind is music software, where VST plugins
and the like are supported by many different applications without the
users having to write a new connecting library for each new plugin.

-- 
-Mark Wieder
 mwieder at ahsoftware.net