Revolution for Voting

[Dar Scott]

On Thursday, April 29, 2004, at 10:57 AM, Zac Elston wrote:

> It would take a few hours to write the same thing in Revolution
> (well the interface/storage anyway) and allow the source code to be 
> open
> as well.

I think this would be a great medium to try out ideas.

A couple potential problems in serious application (guesses):  
Transcript may not be on the list of reviewable languages for most 
states.  A major non-reviewable component is from a foreign company.  
However, it would be interesting, if, because of its readability, if 
Transcript does become a preferred reviewable language.

A lady I know involved in the Democratic Party is campaigning against 
computer voting because, as everybody knows, the Republicans control 
all software.  People will be the greatest problem.

Dar Scott