[OT] browser plugin patents - warning!
Dar Scott
dsc at swcp.com
Sat Sep 13 01:20:01 EDT 2003
On Friday, September 12, 2003, at 05:55 PM, Alex Rice wrote:
> Here are their patents, including the Plugin one
> http://www.eolas.com/technology.html
It seems in the broadest claim a "browser" on a network takes an object
specified by media to be at a certain place and displays it "within the
display area" specified using an "external executable application"
allowing the object to be interactive.
(It may be that this claim is ignored and only more specific claims
apply.)
It seems to me that the way around this is to remove "external" or
"executable application" from an implementation. Just babbling.
Just as long as a Revolution stack is a document and not an "external
executable application".
Dar Scott
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list