Border screen "artifacts" on dynamically moving button on Windows
J. Landman Gay
jacque at hyperactivesw.com
Wed Nov 26 01:25:08 EST 2003
On 11/25/03 7:27 PM, Sannyasin Sivakatirswami wrote:
> We mentioned this before in relation to "Button" and "Menu" where,
> sometimes one want a button to look and feel like a button, and yet
> behave like a pull down menu. This was easily achieved in MC as the
> property inspector showed all such properties that could be set... But
> now, with Rev it's a bit of a headache. If you chose a "menu" from the
> tools you get a property inspector that is "crippled" with respect to
> what you can do the object, which is a "button" in the docs, with a
> property list that is only partially accessible except from the msg box.
>
> Anyway this case is closed... but I wonder if we shouldn't feature request
> that the properties inspector reveal all properties to the user...
I have to agree with you. Limiting the property list in the inspector
gives the impression that each style of button is also a different kind
of object. I think this may be confusing for newcomers, and it makes it
harder for all users to change an object style on the fly. There are
lots of times I start out with one type of button or field and decide
later I want it to be a different type. In Rev, I have to make the
change from the message box. I imagine new users may think they have to
delete the object and start all over again with a new one.
I think a better approach would be to offer all the properties for an
object in the inspector, and let the tool palette act as simply a
shortcut method of setting an object to act a certain way.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jacque at hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list