Fw: Soap Documentation (other than samples)
Edwin Gore
edgore at shinra.com
Thu Jun 12 11:06:00 EDT 2003
I do have the 2.01 version, so I've got the latest stacks. I think a lot of the problem I am running into is that Amazon and RunRev seem to use different terminology for the same thing, and since I am just beginning to fool around with SOAP it's confusing.
As far as Amazon goes, I think I am probably just going to switch over to using their XML version of their web services, sicne they are super easy to understand,a nd do everything that the soap version does - I was able to get my catalog building software for Amazon affiliates to work within abvout two hours...
Thanks!
>> At 2:10 pm -0700 11/6/03, Edwin Gore wrote:
>> >I'm starting to play around with Amazon's Web
>Services stuff, and I
>> >noticed that none of the 2.0 commands for using
>Soap seem to have
>> >made it into the Docs. I know about the sample
>files, and it looks
>> >like that has everything I am going to need to
>start fooling around,
>> >just wanted to make Jeanne et. al. aware that
>none of it made it
>> >into the docs, so it might be hard for some
>people to find.
>>
>> I can't speak for Jeanne or Kevin, but I think it
>was probably a good
>> idea not to include the SOAP stuff in the docs.
>When the revSOAP
>> toolbox was put together (I'll take the blame),
>there had been some
>> requests for SOAP support but nothing specific
>about what kind of
>> support was wanted. At the same time, various
>standards in the web
>> services world were in a state of flux, and new
>standards seemed to
>> be coming into play every other week. So the
>toolbox was basically a
>> guide to how you might put together SOAP
>requests.
>>
>> If more people need to use SOAP, then I'm hoping
>more specific
>> requests might come in about the form this may
>take, appropriate
>> syntax, etc. (Requests to RunRev, please, not
>me.) If something more
>> concrete were to emerge from that, then that
>might be the time to
>> include it in the docs.
>>
>> Please let us know about your experiences with
>Amazon.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Dave
>>
>> PS Do you have the SOAP toolbox that shipped with
>the final release
>> of 2.0? In some of the earlier beta releases,
>there was a less
>> complete "examples" stack only.
>> _______________________________________________
>> use-revolution mailing list
>> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
>>
>http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolu
>tion
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list