spell checker

Bruce Lewis gbrucelewis at sympatico.ca
Wed Jun 4 18:46:01 EDT 2003


Steve,

Do you have any problems with Spell Catcher X?

I have used it (and its predecessors) for many years in all sorts of
programmes. It has caused a lot of grief in Revolution. The glossary
function seems to toss in extra invisible characters that cause problems in
scripts (very hard to track down). I turned that off first.

I forget what the problem was with the spell checking, but I also turned it
off. I think it didn't paste the changes in correctly on a batch check.

It is a real concern for me since I find it much harder to work without it.
In fact, it is the biggest negative about Revolution now. I did report it
to Casady & Greene months ago.

Have you had any bad experiences?

Regards,

Bruce


At 12:33 PM -0400 6/4/03, Stephen Messimer wrote:
>On Wednesday, June 4, 2003, at 11:02 AM,
>use-revolution-request at lists.runrev.com wrote:
>
>> What would be the best way to implement a spell-checker in Rev?
>>
>
>I use Spell Catcher X by Cassidy & Green. It works very well w Rev.
>Here's the URL:
>
>http://www.casadyg.com/
>
>Regards,
>
>Steve
>
>Stephen R. Messimer, PA
>208 1st Ave. South
>Escanaba, MI 49829
>www.messimercomputing.com
>
>_______________________________________________
>use-revolution mailing list
>use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
>http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution




More information about the use-livecode mailing list