Sharing field text

[DVGlasgow at aol.com]

In a message dated 15/1/03 8:18:37 PM, Graham Samuel writes:

<< Of course if I had wanted 

just the one field, I could still have grouped it with a harmless grc 

behind the field or something like that, so the need for the shared 

object to be a group is by no means a show-stopper. >>

In fact you don't need to group the field with anything at all.  A group can 
contain a single object.  It is however sometimes handy to have something 
else in the group because it can clarify whether you have selected the group 
or the object you were aiming at.  If a field and group are virtually 
co-terminous it is not always clear.


Best wishes,

David Glasgow
Home/ forensic assessments --> <A HREF="http://members.aol.com/dvglasgow/">
DVGlasgow </A>
Courses --> <A HREF="http://www.i-Psych.co.uk">i-Psych</A>