textFont -> empty

[Ivers, Doug E]

I guess I can do my own workaround for each stack design, but it requires some bookkeeping/hassle.  Some of the inheritance elegance is lost.  (As an idealist, things like this really chafe me.)

-- D



-----Original Message-----
From: Jeanne A. E. DeVoto [mailto:jeanne at runrev.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 5:15 AM
To: use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
Subject: RE: textFont -> empty


At 3:18 PM -0800 1/4/03, Ivers, Doug E wrote:
>> When I set the textFont of a field to empty (so that the
>> owner determines the font face), the textSize is also set to
>> empty.  Conversely, when the textFont is empty and I set the
>> textSize to something, the textFont is no longer empty -- and
>> it doesn't even take on the owners textFont.  Is this fixed
>> in 2.0?  Is there a workaround?

This hasn't changed in 2.0.

What sort of workaround are you looking for? (I.e. "what do you need to do?")

--
Jeanne A. E. DeVoto ~ jeanne at runrev.com
Runtime Revolution Limited - The Solution for Software Development
http://www.runrev.com/


_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution