I Sure Hope the Build Is Fixed in 2.0
chipp at chipp.com
Mon Apr 7 03:44:01 EDT 2003
After the first successful build...did you *remove* the executable from the
directory where you built it? So, during the second build, there *folder*
was there, but not the *executable*?
If this is the case, I've seen it happen before on Windows (though have not
tested with the latest 2.0beta). My suggestion is to use a archiving utility
(my altArchive plugin;-) or LEAVE the executable in place...copy it out of
the Standalone folder to test.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: use-revolution-admin at lists.runrev.com
> [mailto:use-revolution-admin at lists.runrev.com]On Behalf Of Rob Cozens
> Sent: Monday, April 07, 2003 12:47 AM
> To: use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Subject: Re: I Sure Hope the Build Is Fixed in 2.0
> >Does this mean you did or did not lose work? If the folder deleted
> >was in your Build folder, it shouldn't have contained originals --
> Hi Geoff,
> Right, it didn't contain my originals. Right, I did lose my work:
> Hard Drive: My Files
> App Folder: Rev 2.0B4
> Working Folder: SSC
> Build Folder: Builds
> Standaone Folder
> Standalone folder was removed, leaving individual (unrelated)
> files in Builds
> Every individual file in SSC was deleted, upon which the Dist Builder
> added insult to injury by telling me it couldn't find the stack it
> just removed.
> The only good news was the lost days work was 80% debugging; so
> rescripting took only a couple of hours.
> Rob Cozens
> CCW, Serendipity Software Company
> "And I, which was two fooles, do so grow three;
> Who are a little wise, the best fooles bee."
> from "The Triple Foole" by John Donne (1572-1631)
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
More information about the Use-livecode