mctools.mc v2.6b10 posted

[Ken Ray]

On 6/20/05 3:14 PM, "J. Landman Gay" <jacque at hyperactivesw.com> wrote:

> On 6/19/05 2:09 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
> 
>> To minimize potential conflicts with the engine going forward we may
>> want to use the same IDs Rev uses for the splitter cursors, which are
>> 1031 for horizontal splitter and 201582 for vertical splitter.  But
>> those numbers are so out of sequence they seem strange -- any of you
>> have a moment to double-check those?
>> 
>> Once we confirm the IDs of the splitter cursors in Rev, should we update
>> MC's to match those?  I'm inclined to say yes to be done with it, even
>> if the numbers are oddly out of sequence.  Objections?
>> 
> 
> If I understand it right, the old splitter IDs are now used for other
> things, so I don't see any harm in updating the splitters to the new
> IDs. This change is going to break my old stacks regardless. It will
> break the Variable Watcher too, right?

Yes, but that can be fixed in the next build of the IDE (since I just spent
a bunch of time there...).

Ken Ray
Sons of Thunder Software
Web site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/
Email: kray at sonsothunder.com