mctools.mc v2.6b10 posted

[J. Landman Gay]

On 6/19/05 2:09 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:

> To minimize potential conflicts with the engine going forward we may 
> want to use the same IDs Rev uses for the splitter cursors, which are
> 1031 for horizontal splitter and 201582 for vertical splitter.  But 
> those numbers are so out of sequence they seem strange -- any of you 
> have a moment to double-check those?
> 
> Once we confirm the IDs of the splitter cursors in Rev, should we update 
> MC's to match those?  I'm inclined to say yes to be done with it, even 
> if the numbers are oddly out of sequence.  Objections?
> 

If I understand it right, the old splitter IDs are now used for other 
things, so I don't see any harm in updating the splitters to the new 
IDs. This change is going to break my old stacks regardless. It will 
break the Variable Watcher too, right?

-- 
Jacqueline Landman Gay         |     jacque at hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software           |     http://www.hyperactivesw.com