dammit

[Mark Talluto]

On Jun 7, 2004, at 10:27 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:

> I hate to lose my cool, but I can't get a day's work done with the 
> current state of the error messages coming from the v2.6 engine.
>
> I can usually sort through my own code without it, but I've inherited 
> a large and nasty code base written in alien logic, and there's no 
> reliable means of identifying the source of errors.
>
> Am I the only one who finds this a show-stopper?
> Have y'all worked out a solution and forgot to share? :)
>
> How does the Rev IDE cope with it?
>
> If there was ever an argument for an emergency dot-dot release, making 
> it possible to know what errors are occurring would seem the 
> irrefutable case....
>

It is a massive problem for both IDEs.  I usually have to go back to MC 
2.5 to figure out obscure problems.  They show up correctly once I 
transition.  I don't know about everyone else, but I have three folder 
with different version of MC and Rev to make it through the day.  Lots 
of time is wasted moving from one version to the other.  I only pray 
that 2.3 gives us a working engine.

-- 
Best regards,
Mark Talluto
http://www.canelasoftware.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 1184 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.runrev.com/pipermail/metacard/attachments/20040608/14c20d34/attachment.bin