Proposed Icons for MC

Robert Brenstein rjb at robelko.com
Wed Aug 4 13:23:32 EDT 2004


>>  > We might want to give some thought to image IDs, for Rev compatibility
>>>  where practical and to avoid conflicts with current images IDs.
>>>  Suggestions?
>>
>>Well, I'm fine with changing the IDs of the current images in MC, but keep
>>in mind that this may conflict with other people's icons (i.e. they may have
>>provided their own replacements and now they won't work). I honestly don't
>>think that anyone created images in that ID range for other purposes
>>(because they shouldn't have according to the MC docs), but I can see
>>accidentally kaboshing people's answer/ask dialog replacement icons.
>>
>>Does anyone have any objection to me changing the IDs of the icons in the
>>MetaCard IDE to use the same ID numbers as Rev uses for their icons of the
>>same type/name?
>>
>>Or is there a better suggestion/approach?
>>
>>Ken Ray
>
>While at it, you might want to fix the little issue of icons staying 
>put in the top location instead of sliding down if the dialog 
>content is long.
>
>Using icon ids from Rev might be a good idea if it works as it would 
>ensure full compatibility between environments. People who happen to 
>used those ids will have to change their code when switching to this 
>version of IDE. I don't think it is too much to ask.
>
>Robert Brenstein

I mean that the icons now slide down whereas I'd want them to stay 
put. Am I the only one noticing this?

Robert Brenstein

PS the new icons are really great.


More information about the metacard mailing list