LiveCode Community - anyone up for maintaining the community edition?

Richmond Mathewson richmondmathewson at gmail.com
Thu Sep 9 07:22:22 EDT 2021


Just as a way of showing off my goofiness: how do I compile LiveCode
from your github downloadables?

On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 12:55 AM Paul McClernan via use-livecode <
use-livecode at lists.runrev.com> wrote:

> Well I've wanted to contribute more, and have as time allowed. I first had
> to learn how to use GitHub before I could even start to contribute, and did
> appreciate the hand holding I got from the team along the way. But
> understand that LC needs to be very careful and methodical about what they
> merged into their main repo, this made even contributing simple spelling
> fixes to the docs (which also requires some understanding of .markdown used
> in .lcdoc) a tedious task. Additionally,in don't think it was clear to a
> some users a lot of the IDE/libs are bootstrapped and so one only needs an
> understanding of LCScript to contribute changes.
>
> Contributing to the engine code, however, is not the only way Community
> could contribute. I jumped on the chance to extend the possibilities by
> learning LCBuilder once that became available, made all of my LCB work open
> source in Hope's of encouraging and helping others to get over the learning
> curve inherent in that. Community freely supporting other members of the
> community should also be valued.
>
> I will likely get on board LC10 train at some point, when I know more about
> the improvements being made to it, beyond syntax changea and a faster HTML5
> engine. But I also plan to try to improve and maintain my own fork of LCC,
> and I hope others will explore the many possibilities with that as well.
>
> I've already fixed a bug that I reported back in April in my fork(s) and
> added a link to my fix to that bugzilla report.
>
> https://github.com/PaulMcClernan/LiveCodeCommunity-IDE-DontPanicEdition
>
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2021, 7:56 AM David Bovill via use-livecode <
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>
> > Here are my thoughts on this - and a request.
> >
> > Yes - it’s not a surprising move by Livecode Ltd - they were clearly
> > struggling supporting the community aspect and taking the language to the
> > next level and they need more revenue to do that.
> >
> > The question is (for my part at least) - what to do about this.
> Personally
> > I have never seen a future for a closed source language, and the
> projects I
> > work on will not fund. Projects developed in closed source - especially
> by
> > a small company. So I have a choice, switch language, or look to continue
> > with developing with the community edition and help build an open source
> > community around that. The former (switching languages) is relatively
> easy,
> > the latter a lot of work.
> >
> > I’m happy to have a company like Livecode Ltd create closed source
> > products  that I can use, so how to have both an open source language,
> and
> > the ability to work with closed source products developed by Livecode
> Ltd?
> > As I see it the only option is for those interested in the community to
> > take control and responsibility for the core language.
> >
> > There are a number of options with regard to future language development,
> > that would put the language on an even par with other open source
> > languages, and there are also new ways to finance such initiatives. It
> > would be valuable to get together as a community and discuss those.
> >
> > How about having a community conference to look at what is possible? We
> > can do this online and showcase new and existing open source projects and
> > discuss the opportunities this new environment presents?
> >
> >
> > 📆    Schedule a call with me
> > On 1 Sep 2021, 12:18 +0100, David V Glasgow via use-livecode <
> > use-livecode at lists.runrev.com>, wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > On 1 Sep 2021, at 11:26 am, Bernard Devlin via use-livecode <
> > use-livecode at lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > There you had a group of programmers who supposedly loved what
> > > > HyperCard could do, but they only loved that concept as a historical
> > > > artefact, not as a tool available to people now.
> > >
> > > Abso-frogging-lutely.
> > >
> > > The really interesting questions are “why?" and “Is there anything we
> > could do about it?”
> > >
> > >
> > > Best Wishes,
> > >
> > > David Glasgow
> > > Consultant Forensic & Clinical Psychologist
> > > Carlton Glasgow Partnership
> > > Director, Child & Family Training, York
> > > Honorary Professor
> > > Sexual Offences, Crime and Misconduct Research Unit
> > > Nottingham Trent University
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > use-livecode mailing list
> > > use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> > > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> > subscription preferences:
> > > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> > _______________________________________________
> > use-livecode mailing list
> > use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> > subscription preferences:
> > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> >
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>


-- 

This communication may be unlawfully collected and stored by the Agents
of a large number of governments in secret. The parties to this email do
not consent to the retrieving or storing of this communication and any
related metadata, as well as printing, copying, re-transmitting,
disseminating, or otherwise using it. If you believe you have received
this communication in error, please delete it immediately.



More information about the use-livecode mailing list