LC & Catalina; macOS 10.15.x; Xcode 11.3.x; iOS 13.3.x support ???
bobsneidar at iotecdigital.com
Thu Mar 12 14:37:51 EDT 2020
So from that perspective I am not only contented with LC, I am giddy! But then I am not producing commercial mobile apps either, and for the business I work for, anything useful I produce is icing on the cake! I am under no time constraints, or constraints of any kind!
Having seen the myriad of threads on mobile app development and the pains involved, I can sympathize with anyone attempting it. The hoops RunRev has to go through to keep up is staggering to me, but let's step back for a moment and look at what mobile support for LC really is.
A better way to look at it might be this. Suppose Apple and Google requirements had remained static since LC first began supporting mobile apps. Would any of the obvious pains LC devs are suffering still be issues? If for the most part the answer is no, then you can see the pains are not being caused by RunRev.
> On Mar 12, 2020, at 11:08 , hh via use-livecode <use-livecode at lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>>> hh wrote:
>>> The uselist is not a LC-praising list. As long as we have the freedom of
>>> speech everybody can say whether he is contented with LC or not.
>> Bob S. wrote:
>> I was not aware we had such freedoms on this list! For instance, if I begin
>> to speak of fermented dairy products, I will certainly be censured!
>> And well I should be!!!
> I wonder why you want to speak of fermented dairy products in order to express
> whether you are contented with LC or not.
More information about the use-livecode