OT: Catalina - the end of ad hoc & in-house development?

J. Landman Gay jacque at hyperactivesw.com
Sat Sep 7 11:27:10 EDT 2019


I can't recommend Matthias' tool enough, it can do all Apple requires with 
a click.

Notarization does not go through Apple's approval process, no human ever 
sees it, it's entirely automated. It simply adds a token that proves you 
are a verified developer in good standing. Once that token is "stapled" to 
your app, Gatekeeper won't object when the app is opened. If you choose not 
to embed the token then users do need an internet connection so that 
Apple's servers can verify the token. Matthias' Notarization Helper does 
both notarization and stapling.

However, notarization only applies to Mac apps. There are no distribution 
limits for those. It does not apply to iOS apps, which I believe hasn't 
changed. You can still use ad hoc distribution for iOS apps as before, up 
to 100 devices.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jacque at hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
On September 7, 2019 6:55:45 AM JJS via use-livecode 
<use-livecode at lists.runrev.com> wrote:

> I forgot, it was Mattias Rebbe who wrote the notarizing app which you
> can you fro free, aint that great!
>
> He also made an excellent lesson which is on lessons.livecode.com
>
>
> Op 7-9-2019 om 13:36 schreef JJS via use-livecode:
>> Well said.
>>
>> There is help on this.
>>
>> On of the list members will jump in i guess and he made an excellent
>> tool which will help you out notarizing and all other stuff Apple
>> tries to kill you with.
>>
>> If you already have a Apple dev account (only 100$ per year) which
>> gives you the ability to help 100 people(am i correct?) (thought there
>> was an option for 1000??) then this tool will help you do these things
>> and you can go on with coding as before.
>>
>> I also put stuff on Google Play which is not intended for everybody,
>> but i use a password combination, just like banks do with their apps.
>> Their apps are also not for everyone, but only they who have an account.
>>
>> You could do that too, so only people with access credentials can
>> access the app.
>>
>> Indeed you gave a few reasons why i choose not to develop for Apple,
>> unless i can make enough money with it which compensates for it.
>>
>>
>> Jerry(Sphere)
>>
>> Op 7-9-2019 om 13:18 schreef Peter Reid via use-livecode:
>>> I've been using LiveCode as my development platform since 1999.
>>> Practically all the apps I've developed have been for in-house use by
>>> my family, friends and customers - all very low numbers of copies
>>> distributed in an informal manner. I've no interest in App Store
>>> distribution and the users of my apps trust me such that they do not
>>> need my apps to be "approved" by Apple. What's more important to them
>>> is how quickly I can release new apps and new versions of existing apps.
>>>
>>> Up to and including macOS Mojave my users can run my apps with the
>>> minor inconvenience of having to right-click an app and approve its
>>> use, just once. With macOS Catalina, if I understand things, it's not
>>> so simple, instead these are the options:
>>>
>>> 1. Code-sign and notarise my apps – I'm not interested in this for my
>>> kind of apps which are essentially in-house/at home developments.
>>>
>>> 2. Using an active Internet connection, go through the right-click
>>> technique as now not just once, but EVERY time the app is opened.
>>>
>>> In the past the 'Security & Privacy' General tab had a 3rd option for
>>> the setting 'Allow apps downloaded from:' which allowed you to
>>> install and use apps from any source. It seems that this is not
>>> possible with Catalina.
>>>
>>> So with Catalina my users will need an Internet connection and will
>>> have to go through the right-click authorisation process every time
>>> they open one of my apps.
>>>
>>> More seriously, it is becoming increasingly difficult to recommend
>>> the combination of the Mac plus LiveCode for app development. Up to
>>> now I've done all my app development on Mac+LC, even where the target
>>> platform is Windows or Android or Linux – I find it's simply faster,
>>> less error-prone and more pleasant with the Mac. However, from
>>> Catalina onwards even simple little utility apps, created for
>>> short-term use, will be tedious when opening or you have to learn
>>> about the complexity of code-signing and notarising and accept slower
>>> development cycles due to the need for Apple's approval!
>>>
>>> This is quite depressing, especially since I abandoned iOS
>>> development due to Apple's distribution restrictions.
>>>
>>> Back when the iPad 2 had just been released I developed for one of my
>>> customers an app to support health & safety audits for a national UK
>>> retail chain. The app took me 15 days to develop in total. As a
>>> result of being able to field a team of 10-20 staff with iPads
>>> running my app, my customer was able to carry out 350 half-day H&S
>>> audits for 3 years. However I was unable to roll-out this app to
>>> other customers as the ad hoc distribution method I was using was
>>> limited to 100 iPads per year and the App Store was not appropriate
>>> for this type of app.
>>>
>>> As a result of the limitations Apple impose on tablet app
>>> distribution, recently I developed a speech-aid app just for small
>>> Android tablets and larger phones. I have not made an iOS app. This
>>> app is low volume (in terms of number of users) and requires
>>> significant personalising in order to be effective for its users
>>> (typically they are stroke victims). I chose to deliver the app on
>>> Android because of the facility to use developer mode and because of
>>> price – Android 7in tablet plus minimal add-ons: £80, Apple iPad plus
>>> add-ons: £320. Some of my users of this app already have an iPad but
>>> they are having to buy a cheap Android tablet. Like the Mac and
>>> Catalina, the iPad and iOS is driving away potential app developers
>>> due to Apple's rigid control of the delivery mechanisms.
>>>
>>> Maybe I'm wrong, Catalina will be OK – if I am wrong, please correct me!
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Peter
>>> --
>>> Peter Reid
>>> Loughborough, UK
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> use-livecode mailing list
>>> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
>>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
>>> subscription preferences:
>>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> use-livecode mailing list
>> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
>> subscription preferences:
>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your 
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode






More information about the use-livecode mailing list