Seeking confirmation of a bug...
J. Landman Gay
jacque at hyperactivesw.com
Wed May 29 11:46:22 EDT 2019
Read the release notes. You'll get a much better view of the number of bug
fixes in each version. The last one had 2 pages of fixes.
The team can both walk and chew gum, they're talented that way.
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jacque at hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
On May 29, 2019 3:07:39 AM Richmond via use-livecode
<use-livecode at lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> I'd love to join the regression extermination effort, but I wonder why
> LiveCode central
> seem content to churn ever-onwards into the bright, new future without
> anything visible to rooting out bugs?
> Sooner rather than later I'm going to have to buy a Commercial licence
> again . . .
> But . . .
> On 29.05.19 7:49, Curry Kenworthy via use-livecode wrote:
>> >> install the latest build AND an older version
>> > That begs a question: which older version?
>> Chewed on this a bit, and I'm going to say LC 6.7 because:
>> A) LC 6.7.x versus latest build is still currently the best overall
>> comparison to find the most regressions.
>> B) We kinda need to find and fix the remaining bugs from the big
>> refactoring period, yes? Still finding and reporting more....
>> Join the regression extermination effort! :)
>> Best wishes,
>> Curry Kenworthy
>> Custom Software Development
>> "Better Methods, Better Results"
>> LiveCode Training and Consulting
>> use-livecode mailing list
>> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
>> subscription preferences:
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
More information about the Use-livecode