Slow LC 9 Performance - Test Stack, Video, QA Report

[Mark Wieder]

On 09/07/2018 01:04 PM, Curry Kenworthy via use-livecode wrote:

> Nice to know that bright spot for Linux on the bigger lists and 64-bits! 
> Mac and Windows performance both got 1.7 times worse on those, at least 
> on my machines. I appreciate you testing it.

I misread some of my data yesterday, and there are actually a few other 
places where LC9 is faster than LC6.7 on linux. And just for fun I 
loaded a 32-bit LC9 so it's a more fair comparison.

Append 345678 Items texts (of 1280)
32bitLC6: 4894
32bitLC9: 3895
64bitLC9: 3271

Text Maxed
32bitLC6: 765 : 1018
32bitLC9: 494 : 1341
64bitLC9: 484 : 1469
(casesensitive)
32bitLC6: 760:   928
32bitLC9: 504 : 1308
64bitLC9: 494 : 1285
single-char search text
32bitLC6: 760 : 793
32bitLC9: 504 : 879
64bitLC9: 493 : 804
single-char search text (casesensitive)
32bitLC6: 761 : 743
32bitLC9: 504 : 817
64bitLC9: 511 : 797

Otherwise (math especially) LC6 is much faster.

-- 
  Mark Wieder
  ahsoftware at gmail.com