Differences between Commercial and Community versions of LiveCode

Tom Glod tom at makeshyft.com
Wed Jun 6 12:09:19 EDT 2018


what if for example you want to hard code a hash salt into your code?.....
if the code is readable, then so is the salt.  I would vote for unreadable
code 100% of the time.

On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 10:38 AM, Brian Milby via use-livecode <
use-livecode at lists.runrev.com> wrote:

> For commercial I would think so, but don’t see any issue on the community
> side.
> On Jun 6, 2018, 9:34 AM -0500, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode <
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com>, wrote:
> > Don't we want that NOT to be possible?? Otherwise bring back the runtime
> engine and run the app as a stack file of the runtime.
> >
> > Bob S
> >
> >
> > > On Jun 5, 2018, at 19:37 , Brian Milby via use-livecode <
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Looking at the code, “deflate” is called on the stack as it is being
> written out (zlib). So while not easy, it should be possible to separate a
> stack file from the binary if deployed from the community edition. It would
> take a bit of work to figure out where the file started and ended. Well
> over what I would be willing to tackle at the moment. For anyone so
> motivated, the relevant source code is in deploy*.cpp (along with the
> header files).
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > use-livecode mailing list
> > use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>



More information about the Use-livecode mailing list