intersect . . . invisible images
bonnmike at gmail.com
Fri Jul 14 12:38:13 EDT 2017
The invisible man still had to worry about opening doors and bumping into
things. His shin could intercept painfully with the corner of a coffee
table whether visible or not.
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 10:19 AM, J. Landman Gay via use-livecode <
use-livecode at lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure why the explanation would be difficult. Existence is
> different from appearance. Intersect looks for existence at a particular
> location, visibility is how the object looks.
> Substitute "blue" for "visible" and it's the same thing.
> On July 14, 2017 5:03:09 AM Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode <
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> It does seem illogical that while one can set levels of transparency
>> with interset
>> an image can continue intersecting with another when it is, supposedly,
>> invisible . . .
>> Certainly, having to explain THAT to children is going to make them take
>> an even
>> more dim view of adults than I hope they do already.
> Jacqueline Landman Gay | jacque at hyperactivesw.com
> HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
More information about the Use-livecode