DP6 more strict?

[Mark Wieder]

On 10/04/2015 07:21 AM, Mark Waddingham wrote:

> I'm still somewhat on the fence about it but am intending to wait and see whether the change is going to cause more trouble than it's worth. We can always revert the patch in a subsequent build based on further feedback.

I'm on the fence about this one as well.

Although I'm really tending toward allowing the alternate syntax. If the 
engine's parser can handle it then it seems silly not to change the 
documentation to allow either form. Aren't we supposed to be about 
empowering users rather than dictating and restricting what can be done?

-- 
  Mark Wieder
  ahsoftware at gmail.com